U.S. flag

An official website of the Department of Health and Human Services

SHARE:

FacebookXEmail AHRQPrintShare

National Evaluation of the CHIPRA Quality Demonstration Grant Program: Final Project Report

Appendix B. Products Produced By the National Evaluation Team

Products produced or initiated, featured States, data sources, and month of posting or publication, as of June 2015

Title Featured States Grant Category Examined Primary Data Source Month Posted or Published
Evaluation Highlights      
1. How are CHIPRA demonstration States approaching practice-level quality measurement and what are they learning? Maine, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Pennsylvania Category A Interviews January  2013
2. How are States and evaluators measuring medical homeness in the CHIPRA Quality Demonstration Grant Program? Massachusetts, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, Alaska, Oregon Category C Interviews, Practices’ responses on the Medical Home Index-Revised Short Form (MHI-RSF) May 2013
3. How are CHIPRA quality demonstration States working to improve adolescent health care? Colorado, New Mexico, North Carolina, Utah Category C Interviews August 2013
4. How the CHIPRA quality demonstration elevated children on State health policy agendas Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Vermont, Oregon Cross-cutting Interviews October 2013
5. How are CHIPRA demonstration States encouraging health care providers to put quality measures to work? Pennsylvania, South Carolina Category A Interviews October 2013
6. How are CHIPRA quality demonstration States working together to improve the quality of health care for children? Alaska, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, Wyoming Cross-cutting Interviews January 2014
7. How are CHIPRA quality demonstration States designing and implementing caregiver support programs? Georgia, Idaho, Maryland, Utah Category C Interviews February 2014
8. CHIPRA quality demonstration States help school-based health centers strengthen their medical home features Colorado, New Mexico Category C Interviews May 2014
9. How are CHIPRA quality demonstration States supporting the use of care coordinators? Alaska, Idaho, Massachusetts, Oregon, Utah, West Virginia Category C Interviews July 2014
10. How are CHIPRA demonstration States testing the children’s electronic health record format? North Carolina, Pennsylvania Category D Interviews August 2014
11. How are CHIPRA quality demonstration States using quality reports to drive health care improvements for children? Alaska, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, North Carolina Category A Interviews April 2015
12. How are CHIPRA quality demonstration States improving perinatal care? Florida, Illinois Category E Interviews May 2015
13. How did CHIPRA quality demonstration States employ learning collaboratives to improve children’s health care quality? Alaska, Florida, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Oregon, Utah, West Virginia Category C Interviews June 2015
Implementation guides      
1. Engaging stakeholders to improve the quality of children’s health care Georgia, Idaho, Massachusetts Category E Interviews July 2014
2. Designing care management entities for youth with complex behavioral health needs Georgia, Maryland, Wyoming Category C Interviews September 2014
Manuscripts      
1. Nine States' use of collaboratives to improve children's health care quality in Medicaid and CHIP Florida, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah, West Virginia Category C Interviews November 2013
2. Associations between medical homeness and health care utilization among publicly insured children Illinois, North Carolina, South Carolina Category C Medicaid fee-for-service claims data May 2015
3. What factors influence the ability of State Medicaid agencies to report the Child Core Set of health care quality measures? A multicase study Illinois, Maine, Oregon, Pennsylvania Category A Interviews, DHHS report Under review
4.Primary care physicians’ experiences with and attitudes toward pediatric quality reporting North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio1 Category A Interviews, physicians’ responses to survey Under review
5. After the demonstration: what States sustain after the end of Federal grants to improve children’s health care quality All 18 States Cross-cutting Interviews Under review
6. Parent experiences in child-serving patient-centered medical homes in the CHIPRA quality demonstration Florida, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah Category C Interviews Under review
Special features      
Introducing electronic screening tools for developmental delay and autism into pediatric primary care Pennsylvania Category B State-provided data August 2015
The electronic Student Health Questionnaire (eSHQ) enhances risk assessment for adolescents Colorado, New Mexico Category B State-provided data August 2015

Notes: For all products, we consulted relevant State reports and contacted State officials as needed for clarification and fact-checking.
1 Ohio was included as a comparison State and did not participate in any demonstration activities.

Page last reviewed October 2015
Page originally created October 2015

Internet Citation: Appendix B. Products Produced By the National Evaluation Team. Content last reviewed October 2015. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
https://www.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/appb.html

Click to copy citation