U.S. flag

An official website of the Department of Health and Human Services

SHARE:

FacebookXEmail AHRQPrintShare

Identifying Key Areas for Delivery System Research

References

  1. Guterman S, Davis K, Stremikis K, et al. Innovation in Medicare and Medicaid will be central to health reform's success. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29(6):1188-93.
  2. Masica AL, Ballard DJ. The protean role of health care delivery organizations in comparative effectiveness research. Mayo Clin Proc 2009;84(12):1062-4.
  3. Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Report to the President and the Congress. Washington, DC: June 30, 2009.
  4. Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization, Institute of Medicine. Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.
  5. Robinson JC. The corporate practice of medicine: competition and innovation in health care. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1999.
  6. Robinson JC, Casalino L. The growth of medical groups paid through capitation in California. New Engl J Med 1995;333(25):1684-7.
  7. Casalino L. Canaries in a coal mine: California physician groups and competition. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20(4):97-108.
  8. Casalino L, Robinson JC. The evolution of medical groups and capitation in California. Oakland, CA: California Healthcare Foundation; 1997.
  9. Shortell SM. Increasing value: a research agenda for addressing the managerial and organizational challenges facing health care delivery in the United States. Med Care Res Rev 2004;61(3; Suppl):12S-30S.
  10. Hughes R, Clancy CM. So what? The challenge of doing "need to know" vs. "would like to know" research. Appl Nurs Res 2007;20(4):210-3.
  11. Lawrence DM. Chronic disease care: rearranging the deck chairs. Ann Intern Med 2005;143(6):458-9.
  12. Crosson FJ. The delivery system matters. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24(6):1543-8.
  13. Chin MH, Goldmann D. Meaningful disparities reduction through research and translation programs. JAMA 2011;305(4):404-5.
  14. Jost TS, Casalino LP. Value-based purchasing opportunities in traditional Medicare: a proposal and legal evaluation. In: Elhauge ER, ed. The fragmentation of U.S. health care: causes and solutions. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.
  15. Dudley RA, Landon BE, Rubin HR, et al. Assessing the relationship between quality of care and the characteristics of health care organizations. Med Care Res Rev 2000;57(Suppl 2):116-35.
  16. Casalino LP. Which type of medical group provides higher-quality care? Ann Intern Med 2006;145(11):860-1.
  17. Weeks WB, Gottlieb DJ, Nyweide DJ, et al. Higher health care quality and bigger savings found at large multispecialty medical groups. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29(5):991-7.
  18. Ovretveit J. The contribution of new social science research to patient safety. Social Sci Med 2009;69(12):1780-3.
  19. Alexander JA. Methods and metrics issues in delivery system research. AHRQ Expert Meeting on the Challenge and Promise of Delivery System Research; 2011 Feb 16; Sterling, VA. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/systems/system/delivery-system-initiative/alexander/alexander.html. Accessed January 7, 2014.
  20. Rundall TG, Shortell SM, Wang MC, et al. As good as it gets? Chronic care management in nine leading U.S. physician organizations. BMJ 2002;325:958-61.
  21. Kralewski J, Wingert T, Barbouche M. Assessing the culture of medical group practices. Med Care 1996;34:377-88.
  22. Kralewski J, Dowd BE, Kaissi A, et al. Measuring the culture of medical group practices. Health Care Manage Rev 2005;30(3):184-93.
  23. Kralewski JE, Dow BE, Heaton A, et al. The influence of the structure and culture of medical group practices on prescription drug errors. Med Care 2005;43(8):817-25.
  24. Ovretveit J. Improvement leaders: what do they and should they do: a summary of a review of research. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19(6):490-2.
  25. Conrad DA, Perry L. Quality-based financial incentives in health care: can we improve quality by paying for it? Annu Rev Public Health 2009;30:357-71.
  26. Fung CH, Lim Y-W, Mattke S, et al. Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Ann Intern Med 2008;148(2):111-23.
  27. Iglehart JK. Assessing an ACO prototype: Medicare's physician group practice demonstration. New Engl J Med 2011;364(3):198-200.
  28. Nyweide DJ, Weeks WB, Gottlieb DJ, et al. Relationship of Primary care physician's patient caseload with measurement of quality and cost performance. JAMA 2009;302(22):2444-50.
  29. Ho AD. The problem with "proficiency": limitations of statistics and policy under No Child Left Behind. Educ Res 2008;37(6):351-60.
  30. Landon BE, Normand S-L. Performance measurement in the small office practice: challenges and potential solutions. Ann Intern Med 2008;148(5):353-7.
  31. Adams JL, Mehrotra A, Thomas JW, et al. Physician cost profiling - reliability and risk of misclassification. New Engl J Med 2010;362:1014-21.
  32. Chien AT, Chin MH. Incorporating disparity reduction into pay-for-performance. J Gen Intern Med 2008;24(1):135-6.
  33. Werner RM, Asch DA. The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information. JAMA 2005;293(10):1239-44.
  34. Shekelle PG, Pronovost PJ, Wachter RM. Assessing the evidence for context-sensitive effectiveness and safety of patient safety practices: developing criteria. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; December 2010.
  35. McGowan JJ, Cusack CM, Poon EG. Formative evaluation: a critical component in EHR implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15(3):297-301.

Publication:
14-0024-EF

Page last reviewed February 2014
Page originally created January 2014

Internet Citation: References. Content last reviewed February 2014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
https://www.ahrq.gov/practiceimprovement/delivery-initiative/casalino/paper/idkeydsr4.html

Click to copy citation