Archived Announcements About CAHPS Surveys
This webcast provided an overview of AHRQ’s Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) surveys and patient narratives and described the New York-Presbyterian Hospital (NYP) patient narrative reporting project. The impact of the project on staff and patient experience and NYP leadership perspectives were discussed.
Select to access a recording of the webcast and download related materials.
This webcast described the benefits of participating in the 2022 CAHPS Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS CAHPS) Survey Database (AHRQ-CMS webcast). The database results will be displayed by state and HCBS program types. Voluntary data submission opens August 7 – September 1 to all states and is free.
Drawing on data generated by CAHPS survey items included in the Medical Expenditure Panel.
Drawing on data generated by CAHPS survey items included in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), AHRQ’s 2023 Chartbook on Patient Safety reveals trends in patient experience with provider communication as well as disparities by race, ethnicity, and insurance status. Key findings for 2019 include the following:
- In 2019, 13.9 percent of non-Hispanic Asian patients, 11.5 percent of Hispanic patients and 9.1 percent of non-Hispanic Black patients reported that their healthcare provider sometimes or never explained things in a way they could understand, versus 6.8 percent of non-Hispanic White patients.
- In 2019, 13.1 percent of people with public insurance and 13.0 percent of uninsured people reported that their providers sometimes or never explained things in a way they could understand, versus 7.2% for people with private insurance.
Learn more on pages 71-80 of the 2023 Chartbook on Patient Safety.
AHRQ invites public comment in response to a Request for Information (RFI) about a potential Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) survey to assess patients’ prenatal and childbirth care experiences in ambulatory and inpatient care settings.
Accordingly, this RFI seeks comments about such topics as:
- Priority areas for measuring prenatal and childbirth care experiences in healthcare settings, such as communication with providers, respect, access to services, and patients' perceptions of bias in receiving care.
- Settings of care for which patient experience of care should be developed.
- Existing surveys or survey items currently being used to assess patients’ prenatal and childbirth care experiences.
- Special considerations or concerns associated with the collection of such information.
This RFI will help inform the development of scientifically sound survey(s) to potentially measure patients’ prenatal and childbirth care experience.
Comments in response to this notice were due by May 5, 2023.
This webcast provided an overview of AHRQ's CAHPS surveys, and explained how they focus on patients' priorities, describe how they build on current research in survey development and administration, and discussed how organizations use survey results to improve patient experience.
Select to access a recording of the webcast and download related materials.
Results from the 2022 CAHPS Health Plan Survey Database are now available on the AHRQ's CAHPS Data Tools. The 2022 CAHPS Health Plan Survey Database includes 135,110 survey responses voluntarily submitted for Adult Medicaid, Child Medicaid, and Children's Health Insurance Program enrollee populations.
Selected results from the 2022 CAHPS Health Plan Survey Database include:
- How Well Doctors Communicate was the highest scoring composite measure.
- Getting Needed Care was the lowest scoring composite measure.
- Personal Doctor was the highest scoring rating item.
Learn more about the CAHPS Health Plan Survey Database.
Review results:
- 2022 Health Plan Survey Database Chartbook (PDF, 1.6 MB)
- 2022 Highlights: Infographic (PDF, 899 KB)
- AHRQ's CAHPS Data Tools
Results from the first year of the CAHPS Child Hospital Survey Database are now available in a Chartbook. The CAHPS Child Hospital Survey (Child HCAHPS) Database includes 5,858 survey responses voluntarily submitted by 11 hospitals that administered the survey in the calendar year 2021.
Key findings include:
- Communication Between You and Your Child’s Doctors was the highest scoring composite measure, with 88 percent of parents reporting that providers “always” listened carefully, explained things clearly, and treated parents with courtesy and respect.
- Privacy When Talking with Doctors, Nurses, and Other Providers was the highest scoring single-item measure, with 89 percent of parents reporting they were “always” given as much privacy as they wanted when discussing their child’s care with providers.
- Quietness of the Hospital Room was the lowest scoring single-item measure, with an average of 65 percent of parents reporting that their child’s room was quiet at night.
- Responsiveness to the Call Button was the second lowest scoring single-item measure, with an average of 67 percent of parents reporting that they received prompt help when they pressed the call button.
Learn more about the Child HCAHPS Database.
Review results:
- 2021 Child HCAHPS Survey Database Chartbook (PDF, 838 KB)
- 2021 Highlights: Infographic (PDF, 259 KB).
This webcast explored three free online tools that support the work of AHRQ’s Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) survey users.
- AHRQ Data Tools provide comparative data from selected CAHPS surveys, including top box scores, percentiles, and bar charts.
- CAHPS Analysis Program, commonly known as the CAHPS macro, allows survey users to conduct the analyses needed to produce valid comparisons of performance across similar healthcare organizations.
- "Your CAHPS Survey" enables users to assemble a customized survey instrument to meet their needs.
Select to access a recording of the webcast and download related materials.
In September 2022, AHRQ’s CAHPS program hosted a virtual Research Meeting on how CAHPS surveys shed light on disparities in patient experience and how improved measurement can advance healthcare equity. AHRQ Director, Dr. Robert Valdez, and Dr. Kamila Mistry, Associate Director, AHRQ Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations (OEREP), provided a welcome session to over 600 CAHPS survey users, researchers, healthcare organization leaders, patient advocates, policymakers, Federal partners, and the CAHPS Consortium.
Select to access a summary of the presentations and discussions (PDF, 919 KB). Abstracts of all session presentations are also available in the Appendix.
This AHRQ webcast provided an overview of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Narrative Item sets, and the insights that rigorously elicited and analyzed narratives can provide about patients’ experiences with care that cannot be captured via closed-ended survey questions alone. Speakers explained how patient narratives can help healthcare organizations address challenges and achieve successful quality improvement initiatives.
Select to access a recording of the webcast and download related materials.
This AHRQ webcast provided an overview of the new database for the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Child Hospital Survey. Speakers reviewed the Child HCAHPS Survey and discussed the participation benefits.
Learn more about the CAHPS Child Hospital Survey.
Select to access the recording of the webcast and download related materials.
This AHRQ webcast provided an overview of CAHPS surveys and explained how they focus on patients' priorities and build on current research in survey development and administration. Speakers also discussed how organizations have used survey results.
Select to access the recording of the webcast and download related materials.
In August 2021, AHRQ released the final version of the Patient Narrative Item Set for the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician & Group Survey. In this AHRQ webcast, CAHPS researchers presented the narrative items for both the 3.0 and 4.0 versions of the Clinician & Group Survey and answered questions about using them. They also previewed Narrative Item Sets in development for the CAHPS Health Plan Survey and the Child HCAHPS Survey.
Learn more about the CAHPS Patient Narrative Item Sets.
Select to access the recording of the webcast and download related materials.
Results from the 2021 Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Health Plan Survey Database are now available on the AHRQ Data Tools website.
The CAHPS Health Plan Survey asks enrollees about their recent experiences with their health plan and medical care. The 2021 CAHPS Health Plan Survey Database includes 154,209 survey responses voluntarily submitted for Adult Medicaid, Child Medicaid, and Children's Health Insurance Program enrollee populations.
AHRQ has released the final version of the Patient Narrative Item Set for the CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey. These open-ended supplemental items offer patients the opportunity to provide details about their experiences with primary and specialty care, which produces actionable information for medical practices and groups. Narrative items are available for the 3.0, 3.1, and 4.0 versions of the survey.
New supplemental questions enable CAHPS survey users to gather information on patients' experiences with access to mental health care services, including therapy and medication.
The six questions can be added to either the CAHPS Health Plan Survey or the CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey.
- Review supplemental mental health care items for the Health Plan Survey.
- Review supplemental mental health care items for the Clinician & Group Survey.
These new supplemental questions complement the CAHPS research team's ongoing work to develop and test a stand-alone survey designed to assess patient experience with care for mental or behavioral health issues. Learn more about CAHPS Mental Health Surveys.
Two new versions of the CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey are now available to ensure that patients consider the care they have received by telehealth and in-person when reporting on their healthcare experiences.
- The new 3.1 version of the Clinician & Group Survey includes updates of the wording of some questions in the current Clinician & Group Survey 3.0. The 3.1 and 3.0 versions generate the same measures of patient experience with primary and specialty care and ask about care over the last 6 months.
- The 4.0 (beta) version released this past winter asks patients about their most recent visit.
Updated guidance on implementing the Clinician & Group Survey is also available.
In the first quarter of 2021, AHRQ hosted a series of three webcasts focused on supporting healthcare organizations in using CAHPS surveys to improve the experiences of their patients and enrollees.
- Lessons From Healthcare Organizations on Improving Patient Experience—Speakers discussed using CAHPS surveys to identify aspects of patient experience needing improvement, supplementing survey results with additional information, implementing strategies to provide a better patient and enrollee experience, and evaluating the impact of those changes.
- Improving Patient Experience: Data Analysis Methods—Speakers discussed their use of different data analysis methods to better understand patients' experiences, focus improvement efforts, identify potential solutions, and track the impact of interventions.
- Improving Patient Experience in Large Organizations—Speakers discussed their strategies for identifying aspects of patient experience needing improvement and implementing effective approaches across large, complex organizations.
The CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey Database suspended data submissions beginning in 2021 due to an anticipated decline in participation. All existing CG-CAHPS Database reporting products will continue to be available, including:
- The most recent years of data (2018 and 2019) posted on the Online Reporting System.
- The CG-CAHPS Chartbooks.
- The CG-CAHPS research datasets.
AHRQ will continue to support, maintain, and enhance the CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey instruments.
In the fall of 2020, AHRQ released a new version of the CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey. The Visit Survey 4.0 (beta) asks patients about their most recent ambulatory care visit. The tool helps providers understand and improve patients' experiences with any visit format, including telehealth visits.
In a webcast, speakers discussed the purpose and use of the new survey, its development and testing, topics covered by the survey, and how it differs from the Clinician & Group Survey 3.0. Access the webcast recording and download related materials: Introducing the CAHPS Clinician & Group Visit Survey 4.0 (Beta).
AHRQ has updated the CAHPS Analysis Program, commonly known as the CAHPS macro. The 5.0 version of the CAHPS macro adds new analysis options and updates the test SAS® data set and programs. The SAS-based CAHPS macro supports survey users in conducting the analyses needed to produce valid comparisons of performance across similar healthcare organizations.
Visit Analyzing CAHPS Survey Data to download the 5.0 version of the CAHPS macro with test modules as well as updated instructions for analysts using the program.
AHRQ has released a new 5.1 version of the CAHPS Health Plan Survey. This version includes minor changes to some of the instructions and survey items to indicate the different ways in which patients may be receiving care: in person or via telehealth.
In 2020, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality is celebrating the 25th year of its Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) program. Thanks to this program, healthcare providers, health plans, public, and private purchasers can assess the healthcare experiences of adults and children using over a dozen research-based surveys. Survey users and researchers also have access to comparative data on patient experience and evidence-based guidance on improving and reporting on patient experience.
Read CAHPS®: 25 Years of Putting the Patient First, an AHRQ Views blog from Agency Director Gopal Khanna, M.B.A., and Caren Ginsberg, Ph.D.
Learn more about the evolution and impact of CAHPS.
In September, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services released the CAHPS Emergency Department Survey (ED CAHPS) as a new way to assess patients' experience with emergency department care. Developed by RAND and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the survey is designed to provide meaningful and actionable information that EDs can use to improve their services. In an AHRQ webcast, speakers discussed how the survey was developed and tested; recommended modes of survey administration, including a web-based survey; results from several field implementations; and how to analyze the survey data.
Videos developed to promote the use of AHRQ's Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) surveys have won awards from groups that recognize excellence in communications.
Reasons to Choose a CAHPS Survey and Six Ways to Use CAHPS to Improve Patient Experience earned 2020 Communicator Awards for Excellence in Individual Nonprofit Online Videos. The latter video also received a 2020 Telly bronze award in the Government Relations for Branded Content category. These videos were funded by AHRQ and produced through a contract to Westat.
Given the rapid changes in healthcare delivery throughout the country during the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare providers and health plans want to know how their efforts are affecting their patients. Feedback about patients' experiences with care can help healthcare professionals understand whether they are effectively meeting their patients' needs for care and information.
Assessing Patient Experience With Telehealth
- New survey to assess patient experience with any synchronous visit: One of the greatest changes in ambulatory medical care during the COVID-19 pandemic is the increase in telehealth visits, including phone and video calls. To better understand how patients' experiences vary across different modes of care delivery, the CAHPS Team has released a beta version of the Clinician & Group Visit Survey 4.0. This survey is designed to be applicable to any type of synchronous ambulatory care visit, regardless of whether the care was delivered in-person, by phone, or by video call.
- Adding supplemental items to assess telehealth. Users who want to learn about patients' experiences with patient portals and/or other technology may want to adapt existing CAHPS supplemental items:
- The CAHPS Health Information Technology Item Set includes questions about getting timely appointments through email or a website, getting timely answers to medical questions by email, and the helpfulness of a provider's website or patient portal with respect to providing information about care and tests.
- The supplemental items available for the topic "Access" includes questions about wait times for appointments, care delivered after regular office hours, and wait times for care.
- Administering CAHPS surveys to telehealth patients. Given the importance of assessing how well patient needs are being met with telehealth visits, healthcare organizations may want to include telehealth patients in the sampling frame for CAHPS surveys.
Members of the CAHPS team conducted research on the impact of nurse care coordinators on the experiences of patients and staff.
- Hear about their research in a webcast recording: Creative Strategies to Improve Patient Care Experience.
- Read about their research: Research on Improving Patient Experience.
- Learn more: Lee YSH, Nembhard IM, Cleary PD. Dissatisfied Creators: Generating Creative Ideas amidst Negative Emotion in Healthcare. Work and Occupations May 2019. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1177/0730888419847702.
In September 2018, AHRQ held a research meeting to discuss:
- Improving response rates for CAHPS surveys.
- Enhancing the representativeness of CAHPS survey respondents.
Research meeting participants, including researchers and CAHPS stakeholders, shared findings about CAHPS survey administration methods, discussed stakeholders' needs and concerns, and identified future research questions.
Read a summary of the September 2018 research meeting (PDF).
Learn more about CAHPS research on survey design and administration.
AltaMed Health Services, a Federally Qualified Community Health Center providing care to 300,000 Southern California residents, uses AHRQ's Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) to learn about patient experiences in receiving health care. The results not only help AltaMed improve patient care, but also influence the financial incentives its medical providers can earn.
Originally established as a free clinic in East Los Angeles in 1969, AltaMed offers services to patients of all ages in Los Angeles and Orange counties in more than 40 locations. Services include medical, dental, senior care, urgent care, pharmacy, and HIV care.
According to Alex Y. Chen, M.D., M.S., Interim Chief Medical Officer for AltaMed, the CAHPS survey data are used to hold providers accountable for providing patient-centered care. Chen oversees quality performance improvements and process improvements to ensure that AltaMed health providers deliver quality care to patients.
In part, AltaMed uses the CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey tool to gather information from patients about their experiences of care. All patients visiting an AltaMed clinic who have shared their email addresses receive email invitations to complete the form. In addition, a random sample of patients (about 300 patients per provider per year) also receives surveys by postal mail via a survey vendor.
AltaMed puts a high priority on knowing how its patients view the experience of their care. Not only does the company use the results to make improvements where gaps are revealed, it also recognizes high-performing providers and clinics each quarter.
CAHPS survey data are summarized for individual physicians and made available for all physicians to see. Chen said that physicians like getting CAHPS reports because they provide information that can balance any patient complaints reported to member services. If a patient makes a complaint about a physician, but that physician has good CAHPS scores, the complaint can be reviewed and resolved in that context.
Chen noted, "CAHPS is the gold standard for measuring both the hospital and outpatient patient experience. We use it to track patient feedback on an ongoing basis. We review CAHPS results monthly at the enterprise level, regional level, site level, and provider level."
"CAHPS data enable us to hold providers to the same universal high standard of patient-centric care. Two-thirds of the allocation of the yearly physician bonus payment is based on Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) clinical measures and CAHPS survey results. The remainder is used as productivity incentives," he continued.
To help physicians improve their patient experience scores, AltaMed uses provider "shadow coaching." Physicians who score highest on CAHPS are trained as shadow coaches, who observe care during appointments and provide feedback to other physicians about interactions with patients.
"For providers who are low- to mid-level performers, we manage and help support them to improve their performance," Chen said. Shadow coaching has led to noteworthy improvements in CAHPS scores over time, he noted.
The CAHPS® Cancer Care Survey offers health care providers a new tool for assessing their patients' experiences with cancer treatment in outpatient and inpatient settings. Survey instruments are now available for three cancer treatment modalities: radiation oncology, medical oncology, and cancer surgery. The purpose of the survey is to support the efforts of cancer centers, oncology practices, hospitals, and health systems to measure, compare, and improve the patient-centeredness of cancer care.
Learn more:
Webcast, June 13, 2017—Introducing the CAHPS Cancer Care Survey
In January 2017, AHRQ released a new set of five open-ended questions for obtaining patient comments using the CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey (CG-CAHPS). These questions, called the Patient Narrative Elicitation Protocol (beta version), prompt survey respondents to tell a clear and comprehensive story about their experiences with their health care provider and the staff in his or her office.
Learn more:
A new case study, "Improving Customer Service at Health Share of Oregon," highlights the strategies implemented by Health Share of Oregon, a coordinated care organization serving Medicaid recipients, to ensure that its customer service staff understand and meet the needs of its members.
This case study expands on an April 2016 presentation given by Graham Bouldin, MSW, Manager of Data Analytics & Quality Improvement at Health Share of Oregon, during an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Webcast. The Webcast highlighted the CAHPS Ambulatory Care Improvement Guide and the strategies that health plans can use to improve their enrollees’ experiences.
Can patients really report on the quality of the care they receive? Do patients' expectations affect how they respond to CAHPS survey questions about their providers? Is there a tradeoff between positive patient experiences and favorable clinical outcomes?
To help users of CAHPS surveys address these and other questions, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has released a new podcast: "CAHPS Surveys: Sorting Fact From Fiction," featuring Rebecca Anhang Price, Ph.D.
Select for the podcast and transcript.
Learn more about these issues:
- "Should Health Care Providers be Accountable for Patients' Care Experiences?" in the Journal of General Internal Medicine.
- "Examining the Role of Patient Experience Surveys in Measuring Health Care Quality" in Medical Care Research and Review.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has released a new AHRQ Views blog post from AHRQ Director Andy Bindman, M.D., discussing AHRQ’s unique role in developing surveys to measure patients’ experience with their health care. In addition, a new podcast features an interview with Caren Ginsberg, director of AHRQ’s CAHPS Program, explaining how CAHPS surveys ask about things that matter to patients and are actionable for providers—and what AHRQ does to make sure that’s the case.
Recognizing the challenges posed by multiple requirements for patient experience survey results, the authors of a Health Affairs blog post make a case for greater alignment in patient experience measurement and reporting. Specifically, the authors call on major stakeholders and survey users to reduce the burden of surveying on ambulatory care practices and patients through greater consistency in survey content, sampling strategies, survey administration methods, and the reporting of survey results.
Read the blog: Shaller D, Zema C, Salam F. The Pathway To Sustainability: Aligning Ambulatory Patient Experience Survey Implementation. Health Affairs Blog, September 3, 2015. Available at: http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2015/09/03/the-pathway-to-sustainability-aligning-ambulatory-patient-experience-survey-implementation/
There is ample evidence of a growing interest in patients’ comments about their health care experiences. Whether those volunteered comments provide reliable and useful information to either patients or clinicians, however, is debatable. In the August 13, 2015, issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, Mark Schlesinger, PhD, Rachel Grob, PhD, and colleagues lay out a strong case for collecting patient narratives with the same level of careful, scientific rigor applied to the collection and reporting of closed-ended surveys of patient experience. The authors argue that a methodical approach will result in qualitative information that is complete, balanced, meaningful, and representative. Patient narratives with these characteristics can complement CAHPS survey results and serve a vital role in supporting informed choices by patients and effective problem identification by clinicians.
Read the article: Schlesinger M, Grob R, Shaller D, et al. Taking Patients’ Narratives about Clinicians from Anecdote to Science. N Engl J Med 2015 August. 373;7:675-679.
Learn more about the CAHPS team’s research on patient narratives.
There is ample evidence of a growing interest in patients’ comments about their health care experiences. Whether those volunteered comments provide reliable and useful information to either patients or clinicians, however, is debatable. In the August 13, 2015, issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, Mark Schlesinger, PhD, Rachel Grob, PhD, and colleagues lay out a strong case for collecting patient narratives with the same level of careful, scientific rigor applied to the collection and reporting of closed-ended surveys of patient experience. The authors argue that a methodical approach will result in qualitative information that is complete, balanced, meaningful, and representative. Patient narratives with these characteristics can complement CAHPS survey results and serve a vital role in supporting informed choices by patients and effective problem identification by clinicians.
Read the article: Schlesinger M, Grob R, Shaller D, et al. Taking Patients’ Narratives about Clinicians from Anecdote to Science. N Engl J Med 2015 August. 373;7:675-679.
Learn more about the CAHPS team’s research on patient narratives.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has released a child version of the CAHPS Hospital Survey (Child HCAHPS). This new survey is designed to assess the experiences of pediatric patients and their parents or guardians with inpatient care. Developed by the Center of Excellence for Pediatric Quality Measurement at Boston Children’s Hospital in partnership with AHRQ’s CAHPS Consortium, Child HCAHPS covers most of the topics addressed by the Adult version of the Hospital Survey as well as topics that are particularly relevant to pediatric care.
Read about the CAHPS Child Hospital Survey.
Questions? If you have any questions or comments, please contact the CAHPS User Network at cahps1@westat.com or 1-800-492-9261.
AHRQ’s CAHPS Consortium is proposing to change the time frame for survey items in ambulatory CAHPS surveys from 12 months to 6 months. This means that each item would start with “In the last 6 months” rather than “In the last 12 months.”
The CAHPS Consortium is currently seeking comments about these proposed changes from users and other stakeholders. If the change is adopted, the CAHPS Consortium is considering releasing updated surveys in early 2014.
Background
In the last several years, there has been a steady increase in the use of the CAHPS Clinician & Group Surveys (CG-CAHPS) to assess patients’ experiences with ambulatory care. At the same time, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), a longtime partner in the CAHPS program, has been expanding its use of CAHPS surveys, including the CG-CAHPS Surveys.
Users of the CG-CAHPS Surveys have indicated a need for the different versions to be better aligned so that their organizations can meet multiple requirements without having to administer different survey instruments. To address this issue, the CAHPS Consortium has been working with CMS and other stakeholders to reduce variations among survey versions.
Time Reference Differences Among Survey Versions
One of the key differences among ambulatory CAHPS surveys is that CMS uses a 6-month time frame for items instead of a 12-month time frame. This difference first arose with the original CAHPS Health Plan Survey and has been maintained across other surveys that CMS has adopted.
Proposed Change to Time Frame
AHRQ’s CAHPS Consortium is proposing to change the timeframe for survey items in ambulatory CAHPS surveys from 12 months to 6 months. This means that each item would start with “In the last 6 months” rather than “In the last 12 months.” The change would affect:
- All versions of the CG-CAHPS Surveys:
- 12-Month Survey.
- Patient-Centered Medical Home Survey.
- Items in the Visit Survey that use the 12-month time frame.
- The commercial version of the CAHPS Health Plan Surveys (the Medicaid version already uses the 6-month time frame).
Making this change will bring about a greater alignment between these survey versions and the new versions being used by CMS, and reduce the burden of survey administration for users that face multiple surveying requirements.
The CAHPS Consortium also is proposing a corresponding change in sampling guidelines. Sampling frames for surveys administered at a comparable time would be changed from patients with visits in the previous 12 months to patients with visits in the previous 6 months. Guidelines for continuous sampling are currently being evaluated and will be added to the survey administration guidance.
If you have any questions about this proposed change or would like to provide feedback to the CAHPS Consortium, please contact the CAHPS User Network at cahps1@westat.com or 1-800-492-9261.
Since its release in 2007, the CAHPS Clinician & Group (CG-CAHPS) Survey has become increasingly recognized as a reliable, valid and highly relevant measure of patient experience with ambulatory care. Implementation of this standardized survey is expanding every year, with the list of survey sponsors quickly growing to include hundreds of medical practices as well as State agencies, health plans, and regional multistakeholder organizations.
Many factors are driving interest in and use of this survey, including:
- Its endorsement by the National Quality Forum.
- The patient survey requirements of programs that recognize and certify medical practices and physicians.
- The burgeoning use of patient experience results in the pay-for-performance programs of health plans and other payers.
Perhaps most notably, as charged by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has been introducing variations of CG-CAHPS to assess beneficiaries’ experiences with Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), medical homes, and medical groups. CMS is also required to publicly report on patient experience with ambulatory care on its Physician Compare Web site (http://www.medicare.gov/find-a-doctor/provider-search.aspx), likely starting in 2014.
To learn more about the various public and private forces contributing to the expanding use of CG-CAHPS, check out a brief from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) Initiative: